Miscellaneous

Why Jesus cannot save the converts

Courtesy:- This article was published in Indiafacts.org , written by Kalavai Venkat.

Snapshot:-

Professing your belief in Jesus is totally unnecessary. You can commit the foulest offenses against Jesus or the Holy Spirit without worrying about the consequence because Jesus has anyway irreversibly predestined whether you go to heaven or hell!


Christian fanatics zealously announce, “Jesus Saves!” In this article, I will decisively argue that Jesus is powerless to save the converts. Let us begin with an understanding of what free will and predestination mean in Christianity.

Does one accept Jesus as the messiah out of free will or is it all predestined? In other words, are we saved from eternal damnation in hell by exercising our free will or is it a chance outcome decided by the divine grace of god (or his son Jesus, if you so prefer)? There is no problem in using these two interchangeably for they are one and the same.

There is some scriptural support for free will. Paul admonished his followers to make use of the freedom Jesus had bestowed upon them and not to misuse it again, thereby at least implying some role of free will.[1] Irenaeus (c. 180 CE) was more direct: “Man is rational and therefore like God; he is created with free will and is master over his acts.”[2] Origen (184-253 CE) believed in reincarnation and advanced the most coherent (i.e., logically consistent on a limited scale because it neither explains why the cycle of rebirth should be terminated in favor of an eternal heaven or hell nor is it scientific or correct) Christian argument by asserting that one’s deeds from previous lives predestine one to heaven or hell.[3]

Why does Origen talk about free will as well as predestination? Free will always remained a marginal idea within Christianity, which is an apocalyptic faith system. As a result, Christianity accorded the writ of providence precedence over personal freedom. Hence free will was always seen as a challenge to the divine will. Augustine of Hippo (c. 426 CE) confirms that free will has by this time become a controversial subject and discusses it at length in his work On Grace and Free Will.

Augustine is aware of the paucity of references to free will in scripture. So, even though he asserts that god has revealed the idea of free will in scripture he also adds a caveat that such a revelation is not in human, but divine language. However, he quickly forgets this caveat and invokes John 15:22 to argue in support of implicit free will. In this verse, Jesus claims, in a language quite comprehensible to humans, that since he has revealed himself to the Jews (who were hitherto sinless) they are now guilty of inheriting sin if they do not follow him. Evidently, the author of John 15:22 who implies that the Jews in discussion were not born in Original Sin was unaware of what the author of Romans 5:12 had written – that everyone since Adam is born in Original Sin. So, he unwittingly dismantles the foundational premise of Christianity. Augustine also argues, citing Proverbs 19:3, that a sinner cannot escape punishment claiming to have acted as predestined because he has free will. He also cites Matthew 16:27, “Jesus shall reward every man according to his works,” as an argument in support of free will.

He then cautions one not to deny the grace of god in favor of free will and advances his arguments in support of predestination by the grace of god. Now it is time to discuss predestination as the means to salvation.

What happens to a child born to Christian parents who dies un-baptized? What happened to those who lived before Jesus came to earth? Are they in hell? These categories of people could not have sought Jesus as their savior out of free will. Is it fair to condemn someone to hell without giving an opportunity? Predestination is a response to these ethical questions that confronted early Christians as much as it is a product of the Christian tendency to privilege the will of god over any human agency and effort.

Christianity teaches that one can be saved from eternal damnation entirely by the grace of god without any initiative on one’s part. In other words, by the grace of god, one is predestined to go to heaven or hell. Jesus claimed to have saved a criminal who was dying on the cross with him even though he had not professed his belief in Jesus.[4] The Ethiopian Eunuch,[5] Apostle Paul,[6] and the Philippian jailer[7] were also saved by Jesus before they proclaimed their belief in him. In the Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard[8] Jesus announces that “those who are last (to believe in him) will be the first (to be saved)” and since Jesus is the master of all humans he can do whatever he wants with them, i.e., he can arbitrarily grant some salvation while letting others burn in hell and their rewards need not be commensurate with their deeds. The conclusion here is that one could be saved by the grace of Jesus because of predestination even without proclaiming one’s belief in him by the agency of free will.

Augustine too privileges predestination by grace over free will when he cites Matthew 26:41 where it is said that a man can only avoid falling into temptation by receiving the grace of god. There are semantic differences in how various orthodox Christian sects define predestination but there is no substantive difference in their understanding.

However, the fact that the opposite concepts of free will and predestination find support in scripture did not escape the attention of some Christian theologians. The apologetics of Augustine and Thomas Aquinas are examples of Christian efforts at harmonizing these conflicting ideas.

Augustine begins with a citation of Zechariah 1:3 where god says, “You turn unto me and I will turn unto you,” and argues that here the act of a man turning to god symbolizes free will whereas the reciprocal act of god turning to man symbolizes grace. However, he hastens to add that it is an anathema to claim that the grace one receives is according to one’s deeds performed out of free will and insists that the very act of one turning to god is the result of god’s grace. He corroborates this point by citing 1 Corinthians 15:9-10 where Paul informs us that he received the grace of god while he was still persecuting the Christians. He again invokes Paul, “But be a co-laborer with the gospel, according to the power of God, who saves us and calls us with His holy calling—not according to our works but according to His own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus.”[9]  In other words, one’s free will itself is the product of divine grace. Augustine does not realize that if free will is predestined then it is no longer free will. I wonder whether Augustine was speaking in “divine language” when he made this statement. After this, Augustine slides into meaningless gibberish by uttering such phrases as “eternal life is grace for grace.”[10]

Some Christian theologians correctly recognized that free will and predestination are irreconcilable and mutually exclusive. Suppose that you are predestined to hell. But, you sincerely believe in Jesus out of free will and attain heaven as a reward for the deeds performed out of free will. This scenario would be a damning repudiation of predestination and falsify it. Recognizing this, Thomas Aquinas reiterated the conventional Christian position that every soul is predestined to heaven or hell and that deeds performed out of free will cannot alter this outcome. He also rebutted Origen’s opinion which we encountered earlier by citing Paul, who says in Romans 9:11-12 that God predestines one even before one is born and not by the deeds one performs. In doing so, Aquinas inadvertently refutes Matthew 16:27 where Jesus had promised that he shall reward every man according to his works. Aquinas then makes his own uniquely nonsensical explanation that deeds performed out of free will were themselves predestined, a statement which is as much of an oxymoron as “a planned spontaneous act.”[11]

Aquinas might have been a mediocre philosopher and poor logician but his stance of discarding free will for predestination is biblically supported as the following verses illustrate:

  1. “Jesus chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love he predestined us for adoption to son-ship through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure and will.”[12]
  2. “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith — and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God.”[13]
  3. “And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.”[14]
  4. “He has saved us and called us to a holy life – not because of anything we have done but because of his own purpose and grace.”[15]

Apologists such as Augustine and Aquinas were forced to indulge in verbal sophistry and make illogical statements because they were attempting the impossible in trying to reconcile free will and predestination. They were unable to explain away the fact that their scripture provides two mutually exclusive and contradictory means to salvation. Inadvertently, they end up discarding free will in favor of predestination.

Predestination delivers a fatal blow to the core Christian doctrine requiring one to believe in Jesus. Here is the reason. To predestine a child (or an adult) to go to heaven or hell, Jesus has to be omniscient. In that case, nothing, not even Jesus’ omnipotence, would be able to change the destiny of that person. If Jesus uses his omnipotence to reverse the destiny of a person, then it automatically follows that he was not truly omniscient to begin with because what he foresaw has now been annulled. For Jesus to remain omniscient, which is a precondition for predestination, he cannot be omnipotent. This means that Jesus can never change your fate based on your beliefs.

Hence, your acceptance of Jesus as your savior has no effect on whether you go to heaven or hell. In other words, professing your belief in Jesus is totally unnecessary. You can also commit the foulest offenses against Jesus or the Holy Spirit without worrying about the consequence because Jesus has anyway irreversibly predestined whether you go to heaven or hell! Now you also know that the common Christian assertion that Jesus is omnipotent and omniscient is false!

[1] Galatians 5:1

[2] Against Heresies 4:4:3

[3] http://www.newadvent.org/summa/1023.htm

[4] Luke 23:43

[5] Acts 8:26-39

[6] Ibid 9:18

[7] Ibid 16:25-33

[8] Matthew 20:1-16

[9] 2 Timothy 1:8-9

[10] St. Augustine: On Grace and Free Will, Kindle Locations 2, 10, 33, 141, 153, 164, 176, 196-198, 279-281, 306

[11] http://www.newadvent.org/summa/1023.htm

[12] Ephesians 1:4-5

[13] Ibid 2:8

[14] Romans 8:30

[15] 2 Timothy 1:9

Adapted from What Every Hindu Should Know About Christianity

Featured Image: timaborges.wordpress.com

Disclaimer: The facts and opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. IndiaFacts does not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information in this article.

Leave a Reply

You may also like

Ancient History History Maritime History Medieval History Miscellaneous

India-China Conflict: India’s Victory of 1967 and the 2020 Clash #Sangam Talk By Probal DasGupta

post-image

The Indian army veteran and author of Watershed 1967: India’s forgotten victory over China, Probal DasGupta talks of the Indo-China relations, particularly the lesser known incidents of 1967. The present standoff in Ladakh has raised questions of war and has brought up the historic narrative between the two countries. today. For fifty years, the event that dominated our memories was the 1962 India-China war, which India lost. However, the present crisis has focused on India’s victory over China in 1967. Probal’s book Watershed 1967 has played a significant role in reshaping the India-China narrative. In this talk he discusses China’s motives and India’s options today, and how 1967 is relevant in the current India-China skirmishes.

About the Speaker:

Probal DasGupta is an Indian army veteran and author…

Read More
Ancient History History Maritime History Medieval History Miscellaneous

Tibet: How Nehru lost India & Tibet in 1954

post-image

Courtesy: Sheshapatangi1 https://twitter.com/sheshapatangi1/status/1519882907455696899?s=21&t=Xt1Vy_kfGP9wkhdxbMWI8w

On this day in 1954, Nehru Government Officially DENOUNCED TIBET.

Excerpts from Tibet – The Lost Frontier by Claude Arpi.

On May 15, 1954 – Nehru summed up the debate in the parliament by saying “in my opinion, we have done no better thing than this since we became independent. I have no doubt about this… I think it is right for our country, for Asia and for the World”.

It took only few days for India to discover that all problems had not been settled. The first Chinese incursion in the Barahoti area of Uttar Pradesh occurred in June 1954. This was the first of a series of hundreds of incursions which culminated in the attack of October 1962.
In school,…

Read More
Ancient History History Maritime History Medieval History Miscellaneous

Weapons from Punjab and Rajasthan seized in Maharashtra

post-image

While the Hanuman Chalisa and Azaan issue is simmering in Maharashtra huge batches of Swords and other weapons transported from states like Rajasthan and Punjab are being seized in Maharashtra. In last few days three such cases have been registered by Maharashtra police. Isn’t it a clear message that violence is knocking on the door? The rioters being celebrated and awarded in Karnataka and the long list of benefiters from Karauli riots convey the same! Wake up Hindus!

Source: https://www.naidunia.com

Maharashtra के धुले में मिला हथियारों का जखीरा, तलवार और खंजर समेत 90 हथियार जब्त, 4 आरोपी गिरफ्तार। अजान को लेकर राज ठाकरे की होने वाली सभा के लिए, राजस्थान से भेजी जा रही थीं तलवारें।

महाराष्ट्र के धुले जिले से भारी मात्रा में हथियार…

Read More
Ancient History History Maritime History Medieval History Miscellaneous

One more territory lost to the changing Demography! The Uttarakhand!

post-image

Courtesy: https://twitter.com/anshul_aliganj/status/1517047053821825025?s=21&t=m0uR2PDEkJsDWLonYOQqAg

In Uttarakhand the Tourism Industry has been taken over by Samuday Vishesh. After the change in demography this was bound to happen.

Gadhwal was lost already and and now kumaon getting lost. Be it Nainital, Bhimtal, Ramnagar, Bageshwar,Jageshwar,Ranikhet and Kisano every where you will find them.
Locals have leased their hotels and restaurants to them.

Even when they are of not so well off background still they are able to do highest bidding and are able to get the hotels on lease.
Samuday Vishesh People from far off places have come and taken over Uttarakhand Tourism.

They have removed the local waiters , cooks and…

Read More
Ancient History History Maritime History Medieval History Miscellaneous

The Jama Masjid of Ahmedabad on the glorious Bhadra Kali Mandir

post-image

Source:
https://www.booksfact.com/archeology/jama-masjid-ahmedabad-bhadrakali-temple.html

The Jama Masjid in Ahmedabad was originally A Bhadra Kali temple. It was converted into a mosque by Ahmed Shah I. The intricate flowers, coiled serpents representing Kundalini and bells, the remnants of the glorious temple that it may have been. Such carvings are banned in Islam. This goes on to support the history of the temple. Goddess Bhadrakali was believed to be the Nagar Devi of Ahmedabad.

One of Ahmedabad’s ancient names was Bhadra which was after Devi Bhadrakali. Ahmedabad was named after Ahmad Shah I of the Muzaffarid dynasty who forcibly captured “Karnavati” in 1411.

Bhadrakali temple is believed to be one of the oldest temple of Ahmedabad and located inside Bhadra Fort in center of city.The exact date of construction is not known but as per the evidence this holy shrine…

Read More
Ancient History History Maritime History Medieval History Miscellaneous

Facts about Mahmud Ghazni

post-image

Courtesy: Eztainutlacatl

How many of you know that Mahmud’s father was a Kyrghyz Buddhist caught in childhood and converted forcibly? How many know that Mahmud is called Zabuli because he was born out of a forced union between that slave Sabuktegin and a Zabuli Princess?

And how many of you know that Multan sided Mahmud against the Shahis in the name of religion but Mahmud decided Multan was not Muslim enough and attacked it? And how many of you know that of the 17 raids of Mahmud, 14 are against his neighbour, the Shahis?

And how many of you know that Mahmud is not exactly great – he waged an annual jihad against India but in 31 his year rule, only 17 raids are known – what happened to the balance 13? And how…

Read More
Ancient History History Maritime History Medieval History Miscellaneous

Kastur Ba: the secret shadow

post-image

On her 153rd Birth anniversary

Courtesy: Sheshapatangi1

https://twitter.com/sheshapatangi1/status/1513352430250995715?s=21&t=i81i06F0q8_Wv8EeFTvdjg

“I simply cannot bear to look at Ba’s face, the expression is often like that of a meek cow and that in her own dump manner she is saying something” –
MKG

To keep the brand, “Mahatma” popular, they never told the miserable story of his wife.
On her 153rd birth anniversary, let us revisit a tragedy called #KasturbaGandhi.

Born on April 11, 1869 at Porbander, Kasturba was elder to Gandhi by 6 months, she married Mohandas with whom she played since her childhood.

Gandhi’s rejection of Kasturba came to the extent…

Read More
Ancient History History Maritime History Medieval History Miscellaneous

My people uprooted

post-image

Courtesy: Shri Tathagata Roy

HISTORY.
8 April 1950 a fateful pact signed betn Jawaharlal Nehru & Liaquat Ali Khan,PM of Pakistan. After 2 months of Govt-engineered pogrom,slaughter, rape of Hindus in East Pakistan. Estimated 50,000 Hindus killed. An instance of incredible political stupidity on Nehru’s part.

Upon Liaquat’s glib assurance that Hindu refugees would be taken back and restored,the gullible Nehru decided that no rehabilitation of Hindus was necessary in India. Result: no refugee went back and were forced to live under inhuman conditions in Indian camps.

The Pakis were so insincere about the pact that their Govt issued secret instructions not to restore any Hindu to his property. Even after the pact all Hindu passengers in down Assam Mail were pulled down and killed just outside Santahar station.

The two Bengali ministers…

Read More
%d bloggers like this: